European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology
adminname | view : 1462 | 2019-06-13 (13:01)
▷ 첨부파일 : 캡처.JPG (43032 Byte)
[저장]
▷ 첨부파일 : European Journal of Obstetrics...pptx (2443035 Byte) [저장]
Among 4,117 women who simultaneously or subsequently underwent Pap cytology, HPV test, cervicography, and colposcopically directed biopsy, cervicography and Pap co-testing had superior screening capacity (sensitivity: 97.5% vs 93.7%) and cost-effectiveness (cost: $1,474 vs $1,135) for detection of pre-invasive cervical lesions than HPV and Pap co-testing and may be an effective and cost saving screening strategy in clinical practice in country with a high prevalence of cervical cancer.
▷ 첨부파일 : European Journal of Obstetrics...pptx (2443035 Byte) [저장]
Among 4,117 women who simultaneously or subsequently underwent Pap cytology, HPV test, cervicography, and colposcopically directed biopsy, cervicography and Pap co-testing had superior screening capacity (sensitivity: 97.5% vs 93.7%) and cost-effectiveness (cost: $1,474 vs $1,135) for detection of pre-invasive cervical lesions than HPV and Pap co-testing and may be an effective and cost saving screening strategy in clinical practice in country with a high prevalence of cervical cancer.
![[저장]](download.php?table=notice&num=22&real_name=2019_06_24_10_54_01_0.JPG&show_name=캡처.JPG&file_type=){kind=link}